Page 144 - kpiebook67020

143

(1) In terms of content, the creation of fake news is seen to elicit
reactions from all parties. Since social media became an integral part of

everyday life, accessing and sharing information can be easily accomplished
within seconds. Additionally, trust in traditional mass media has waned.

In situations of political conflict, fake news can easily proliferate, with
information circulating rapidly in society. During times of political conflict,

individuals tend to gravitate towards information that aligns with their
own political beliefs or ideologies whether that is authentic information

or disinformation. Moreover, social media platforms' algorithmic systems
often prioritize content that matches users' interests. When fake news is

created and disseminated, it further fuels political conflicts and events
that may cause harm. Therefore, in terms of content, it cannot be denied

that fake news contributes to heightened political conflict. To address
this issue, content regulation is essential to prevent the dissemination of

potentially harmful fake news.

(2) Content governance mechanisms for dealing with fake news in

Thailand also need consideration. Legally, there is still no clear definition
of what "fake news" encompasses and to what extent it applies. The primary

laws employed to combat fake news include the 2017 Computer Crime
Act (No. 2). In Thailand, fake news has been framed as both securitization

and politicization. When viewed through the lens of security, fake news
is considered a "threat" to national security. It is necessary to use all

available means to maintain national stability and utilization of power