Page 29 - kpi18358

(mean 5.90, SD = 2.51) and useful application of technology and information in the inspection system

(mean 5.78, SD = 2.08) were given the lowest scores, but informants see considered them as being at
moderate level.

Considering the views of informants by group, i.e., inspectors general, assistants to inspectors
general, and civil advisors, inspectors general tend to give high ratings on the integrated inspection

system’s responses to all five challenges. Assistants to inspectors general and civil advisors, however,

tend to agree that the integrated inspection system still does not deal with the five challenges effectively.

The reason why civil advisors assign quite low scores might be because the civil advisors are not closely
involved in the inspection process, specifically in formulating issues, planning, and reporting. The only

stage that involves civil advisors is co – inspection with inspectors general in each advisor’s local area.

This makes civil advisors have less acceptance of the integrated inspection system compared to other
groups of informants.

Inspection in accordance with area-based management

Inspector general

Assistant to Inspector
General

Civil Advisor

Figure 2. Ratings for sub-aspects of inspection in accordance with area-based management

Remarks: A1=Planning that links with area and various sectors
A2=Monitoring and evaluation after inspection
A3=Appropriate, prompt, evidence-based inspection reports from civil sector

xxvi