Page 26 - kpi18358
P. 26
3. Obstacles to the roles and standards for the Integrated Public Service Inspection System
The Integrated Public Service Inspection has problems regarding structure, staff, processes, and
support that prevent it from fulfilling its role and achieving inspection standards.
Structure
An integrated inspection system remains out of reach because of the inspection structure’s three
levels: the Prime Minister’s Office, ministerial inspection, and departmental inspection. The three levels
of inspection are divided so they cannot actually lead to linkage and integration in the Integrated Public
Service Inspection system.
The Official Inspection Bureau, an agency under the Prime Minister’s Office, is supposed to be
directly responsible for the Integrated Public Service Inspection system, but the bureau also has other
duties assigned to it by the prime minister. Staff of the bureau handle many tasks including providing
support for monitoring and follow - up of regional practices, support for the Good Governance
Committee, and support for the Government Sector Audit and Evaluation subcommittee. Moreover, the
office has to carry out additional missions, mostly related to policy works as assigned by the prime
minister or a deputy prime minister, which are outside the bureau’s main duties and increase its workload.
This affects the bureau’s efficiency in performance of its main responsibilities and routine work.
Staff
The key people in the inspection system are the inspectors general and the supporting staff. The
researchers found that some inspectors general came to their positions without the purpose of performing
an inspection role. This had an adverse effect on the motivation and competency of inspectors general, as
well as the value and significance of inspection. Moreover, there are still no sufficiently specific
competencies for inspectors general, nor are there standards for conducting inspections. Inspections now
depend on individual inspectors’ knowledge, skill, and experience. Even though the system has an
inspection guideline, it is just a brief framework, and it is not a standardized requirement. The guideline
should be universalized, analyzed, and formally prescribed.
In terms of support staff, entry to the position of support officer still requires no specified
qualifications and there are no work standards for the position. The rules for work are unfavorable to
personal development and experience. Furthermore, under Office of the Civil Service Commission
xxiii