Page 86 - 6550
P. 86

 ∂“∫—πæ√–ª°‡°≈â“






                                                       ∫∑∑’Ë  4



                                           ®ÕÀåπ  ®ä«√åµ ¡‘≈≈å°—∫·π«§‘¥


                                              ‡√◊ËÕß°“√ª°§√Õß∑âÕß∂‘Ëπ





                                       çThere is no universally accepted notion as to the proper

                                    nature of local democracy.....and many of those who use the
                                    term are simply talking past one another.é
                                       ç∑’˺à“π¡“    ‰¡à‡§¬¡’·π«§‘¥„¥∑’ˉ¥â√—∫°“√¬Õ¡√—∫Õ¬à“ß

                                    °«â“ߢ«“ß«à“ª√–™“∏‘ª‰µ¬∑âÕß∂‘Ëπ§«√¡’≈—°…≥–Õ¬à“߉√  ·≈–
                                    §π®”π«π¡“°∑’Ë查∂÷ߧ«“¡À¡“¬¢Õߧ”π’ȵà“ߧπµà“ß查

                                    ‰¡à π„®øíß°—π...é
                                                                    John Gyford, 1986   1













                               1
                                John Gyford, çDiversity, Sectionalism and Local Democracyé, Research vol. IV of
                            Widdicombe Report on the Conduct of Local Authority Business. Committee of Inquiry into the Conduct
                            of Local Authority Business, Cmnd 9797-9801 (London: HMSO, 1986), p. 106


                                                           76
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91