Page 176 - kpi19897

positive consideration to the result of regional assessment). This

reflects the reality that ASEAN is not ready to fully delegate
power to the regional level at this stage. Moreover, as a
88
centralised mechanism, the status of ACPE mutual understanding

and assistance regarding qualification and license system of
other member countries, given the differences in development

level and different approaches to qualifications and licensing in
each member country. It can be argued that having an ACPECC
is useful for developing the capacity of both national authorities

and ASEAN institutions. Each ASEAN member must identify
the PRA that is responsible for the regulation of engineering

services in each country and acceptance of ACPE applications.
In addition, ACPECC’s capacity will also be strengthened in areas
such as monitoring and information sharing of the performance

of ACPE holders. 89

3.3.2. National Implementation of MRAs

In relation to the medical services, the national actions
are expected to be undertaken by member states variously
depending on the domestic regulation regime due to the fact

that there is no regional registration system and monitoring

88 id. at, 16.
89 id. at, 16-17.

Policy Forum 175

134-200 inside_PolicyForum_figure1_New.indd 175 30/1/2562 BE 14:27