Page 9 - kpiebook64008
P. 9

the political groups in the Chiang Mai PAO election implies: “Chiang Mai Khunnatham Group”,
               “Pracharat Chiang Mai Group”, and “Chiang Mai Kao Mai Group”. They presented their groups as

               having links to the political parties, both symbolically and explicitly during the electoral campaign,
               even though such parties did not officially announce their support or nominate the candidates
               as political party representative. This phenomenon reflects the voting behaviors of the people in
               Chiang Mai which emphasized the increasing role of political parties and their policies in shaping

               their voting decisions.

                       However, one of the remarkable differences between the 2019 general election and this
               2020 local election is the fact that the platforms of the candidates from political parties and
               independent groups concerned local issues, for example, the PM 2.5 haze, public utilities, and
               tourism promotion for  economic growth in Chiang Mai. There were more attempts of local

               politicians  to  build  political  support  networks  with  private  businesses  and  civil  society
               organizations in Chiang Mai. Moreover, During the electoral campaign, they focused on making
               campaign speeches and community outreach via joining community religious or cultural events.

               The use of campaign trucks, campaign banners, and campaign brochure dissemination in fresh
               markets were still the electoral campaign methods which are more relevant to the local identity
               in Chiang Mai than using online or social media as electoral campaign tool like during the 2019
               general election.

                       The context of the competition during the Chiang Mai PAO election was that of the

               political  competition  between  a  political  party  and  an  independent  political  group,  that  is,
               between the Pheu Thai Party and the Chiang Mai Khunnatham Group—both of which have had
               a close relationship with the dissolved Thai Rak Thai Party, the defunct People’s Power Party, and
               their third incarnation Pheu Thai Party. Therefore, during this PAO election, there appeared an
               interesting political phenomenon of “trying to prove who’s more Red”. The presence of the core

               leaders of the Pheu Thai Party and the Red Shirts during the campaign speeches of both the Pheu
               Thai and the Chiang Mai Khunnatham candidates caused hesitation and confusion among the
               qualified voters and underscored the conflicts among the political supporters and networks of

               election canvassers, as well as their struggles for political resources in Chiang Mai. Meanwhile, the
               struggles and competition in the Chiang Mai PAO electoral arena highlighted the importance of
               political families in local election: the Shinawatra family (Pheu Thai) and the Buranupakorn family
               which has long played a crucial role in Chiang Mai, both politically and economically. The Chiang

               Mai PAO election was thus significant for the Pheu Thai Party not just to win the ballot but to
               prove the status of the Pheu Thai Party in Chiang Mai, which could be seen from the fact that the
               former  prime  ministers—both  Thaksin  Shinawatra  and  Yingluck  Shinawatra—sent  supportive
               messages and video clips to help the electoral campaign of the Chiang Mai PAO Chief Executive



                                                                                                                 ช
                 โครงการศึกษาการเลือกตั้งระดับท้องถิ่น ปี 2563: การเลือกตั้งสมาชิกสภาองค์การบริหารส่วนจังหวัดและนายกองค์การบริหารส่วนจังหวัดเชียงใหม่
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14