Page 348 - kpiebook63002
P. 348

348     ²£›£°Š¸¡§´Š²²£
                      ª–²š±™ž£°›À¥i² „£±É‡—µÈ
                  œ¤±‹³™µœÃ–£Ã˜£  ‚j³¨£i³ˆ¿Ÿ¸Ç®‚³¤Ÿ²“š³

                    meet in person. And then this one day in September, they met for 3-5 hours. Some
                    just the two, and other cases with audience even with media audience all together
                    20,000 people. They participated in this event. The interesting result is that in 1/3 of
                    the cases, they came up with compromises. So, in 2/3 they couldn’t agree, but in 1/3
                    they said we should meet again. Develop further the compromises we might capable
                    to develop.  I don’t know if this idea would fit into the Thai culture, but I wanted to
                    share it with you because it is an interesting example, I think.  And with this I would
                    like to thank you for your attention.


                                                           #####

                          Thank you very much Dr. Norbert. Actually it was very interesting, like the very
                    last issue that Norbert just address is about taking My Country Talks.  It’s similar to
                    what we call National Dialog. Is it the same? Almost the same, or not the same?


                          No, it’s a little bit different, but we can discuss that later.


                          It’s a kind of process that we have the platform for people who have a lot of
                    controversial issues. I’m not sure whether it would be totally applied to Thailand,
                    because the controversial issue in Thailand is unspeakable. So, then it depends.
                    We can discuss about this later. It’s gonna be very interesting discussion later on.

                          Dr. Norbert addressing about inclusive or inclusion of people or conflicted people
                    in the peace process, that’s very important. In Thailand right now, we have heard a
                    lot of what we call no one left behind. So, that’s what we might talk about inclusive
                    society. So, then in the peace process, the inclusion is very important. And then
                    when we have to address the conflicted situation in the reality, but then we have to
                    make it subsistent and also in the realistic manner. And of course like try to build
                    trust among those conflicted parties, and try to pursue something that deal with the
                    structure and perception of the conflicted parties. So, that’s Dr. Norbert’s address in
                    the first round.  We wish that this process could lead into building peace as a path
                    towards a more understanding and better democratic society in Thailand.

                          Right now we have our second speaker. I’d like to address Dr. Achman Munjid.
                    So, he will mainly discuss about peace building as interfaith dialog, and the role of
                    the women in democracy. Please.








           ª£¸›²£ª±¡¡™²¥¸h¡¢h­¢—µÈ
   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353