Page 113 - kpi17968
P. 113

102





               ministerial code that all ministers must operate strictly within the
               rule, within the law.  Big question to what the law is, of course, but
               not so far we are going to find that and look at this.  It is very
               clear, I think, from the principles of Magna Carta for government
               to work through the law and not in spite of it.

                     The second principle I would like to just flag out, which
               goes to the Greater Magna Carta, “What is the liberty of the
               individual?”  I will just pause again to note another thing to
               celebrate, which is the cases we have talked about the difference
               and later are our legal systems and common law cases in the UK.
               which are presently important and have a hugely significant role
               in our legal system.  But in case of Carrington which is 250 years
               old this year as well.  And that concerned the delicate balance
               again between the needs of an affected government and the
               freedom of individuals to oppose such government and to reserve
               their rights before the courts.  That case involves Mr. Carrington
               who was the King’s messenger.

                     He had broken in to the home of Mr. Entick, a writer with,
               as quoted, force and arms.  And over the course of 4 hours, he
               opened locks, he broke down doors, he searched all rooms before
               removing pamphlets, papers and researches and causing thousands
               of Pound (Sterling) worth of damage.    5

                     The King’s messengers were not acting arbitrarily, they were
               acting on the orders of the Government Minister, Lord Halifax.
               But Mr. Entick challenged that on the court.  That was the first
               time made very clear that such action was illegal.  As recognized,
               there could be limits placed on liberty but on dry constitutional
               place of parliament to democracy, if parliament wanted to admit
               the arrest or detention, it had to legislate to do so. For us, the
               principal legality started to retake form and shape and power.

                     But it is also recognition, I think personally, that government
               power must be exercised in accordance to the law.  But the object
               of the law is also to void the arbitrary use of that power.  And how
               do we do that?  I think, there we come to one of the third


                   5   Entick V. Carrinton, 1765




                 การอภิปรายรวมระหวางผูแทนจากตางประเทศ
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118