Page 82 - kpiebook63002
P. 82

82     ²£›£°Š¸¡§´Š²²£
                      ª–²š±™ž£°›À¥i² „£±É‡—µÈ
                  œ¤±‹³™µœÃ–£Ã˜£  ‚j³¨£i³ˆ¿Ÿ¸Ç®‚³¤Ÿ²“š³



                        /TU .GGPC 4KMMKNC 6COCPI

                             Thank you for the question. We look at the democracy indices, have five
                        main attributes: representative government, fundamental rights, checks on
                        government, impartial administration, and participatory engagement; not
                        decentralization, not devolution of power as such. But under each of these sub-
                        attributes depending on looking at all the levels of government. If a country
                        would be a federal one, yes, then you would be assessed all these aspects of
                        the national, province, state and local level. If not, then, national and the local
                        level. It is not a topic or attribute as such, but, indeed, that applies to
                        whichever level required.



                        2TQHGUUQT 5GDCUVKCP 2C[PG

                             Thank you for your question. My point about local government falling out
                        of fashion to study was really because it mirrors in a way the decline of local
                        government. Clearly the risk local government have, much of it’s effective.  But,
                        in the UK, but nonetheless, it has been weakened partly by the actions of
                        Margaret Thatcher and partly by financial constraints. And my point really, was
                        a local government is very important for the flourishing of democracy. What, in
                        the UK, has happened is that they’ve been put in place a number of mass
                        serve where the Greater London Council. We now have a rather weak body
                        with the mayor of London. This turn to presidential star politics, with what is
                        demonstratively, a certain vulgar populism in some of the previous mayors of
                        London, is bad news. So, I’m delighted to hear that local government is
                        flourishing in Asia.


                        &T  5QPCO -KPIC

                             Thank you, sir. I was not exactly sure what your question was if you’re
                        not satisfied with my response, we can chat over, but let me try to begin by
                        saying that, in Bhutan, far long before the establishment of the central
           ²£­ ´›£²¢¡¸¡¡­‡Á¥°›£°ªš²£“lˆ²•h²‡›£°À—¨
                        government, local government wears the traditional features of village
                        communities. So, what I’m saying is the practice of local governance predates
                        centralization of authority. It is from this tradition that later modern governments
                        drew and built up institutions of providing goods and services to the
                        community. Another feature is local governments have largely been rural in
                        nature. We talk about municipal, town government. These are very recent in the
                        sense that urbanization began only in the 60s. So, today we have 205 village
                        assemblies, and four municipal governments. When we began in the 80s and
                        90s, this did not begin as local governments, but rather as local development
                        communities, where they have elected members, certain powers, and certain
                        resources are pumped in. Today, the possibility of local governments becoming
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87