Page 139 - kpiebook63002
P. 139

²£›£°Š¸¡§´Š²²£
                                                                                       ª–²š±™ž£°›À¥i² „£±É‡—µÈ      139
                                                                                           œ¤±‹³™µœÃ–£Ã˜£  ‚j³¨£i³ˆ¿Ÿ¸Ç®‚³¤Ÿ²“š³

                     basically, which is why we are in trouble. The morality that says “You should not be
                     corrupt, you should obey the law.”, and other morality says “You have to take care
                     of your family.” So either way you are a hero. You are a hero to the society or
                     you’re a hero to your family. That is part of the tragedy that keeps on playing in the
                     Philippines.

                           Political institutions are organizations which create, enforce, and apply laws.
                     They mediate conflict, make government policy, and economic society. We have
                     political parties, civil society organizations, the courts, of course, the executive,
                     the bureaucracy, the mass media, social media, and so and so. These are all
                     organizations. They are political institutions.

                           The first insight I have is that, of course, the misuse of the military can lead to
                     the corruption of democracy. That is usually the main entry point to constitutional
                     authoritarianism that use the military to take over the civilians. Here is a statement
                     from President Duterte. He is fond of making a lot of pronouncements. This
                     pronouncement he says “The military blew the chance for true change in the
                     Philippines.” He’s saying that when the people power revolt happened in 1986 after
                     Marcos, that the military should have continued to rule the Philippines. Now that is..
                     can you imagine that coming from the President of the country that has the
                     democratic constitution. Lately he’s been offering to the military. As I have said
                     before, if you want to hold the junta, you just tell me. He’s been trying to invite the
                     military. He’s been courting the military from day one, moving from camp to camp
                     across the Philippines. But for some reason, the military has not taken the top even in
                     his attempt to involve the military in the campaign against drugs, in which thousands
                     of people have been killed because of the drug war. The military has refused. They
                     have politely said “Mr. President, if you want us to join, please give us a written
                     order.” And Mr. Duterte has not given them a written order, so they have not
                     participated with the police in going after,nd in many ways, killing drug addicts.


                           What can go wrong? Despite the fact that the military is steadfast, so far, what
                     can go wrong is exposing the military who seizes the opportunity for corruption. And
                     I think that’s one of the dangers. Mr. Duterte has appointed military, men, retired
                     chief of staff, generals to positions, including positions for which they, to me and
                     many people, they are not qualified for. For instance, our Department of Social
                     Welfare and Development is now headed by a retired general. The recent order of
                     President Duterte for the military to take over the Bureau of Customs, to us, is a
                     blatant attempt to bribe the military to, perhaps, tempt them with some incentives for
                     changing their minds.
                           In the Philippines, the armed forces is the most crucial political institution for
                     sustaining democratic governance. Now, what can political institutions do? Well, the
                     political constitution limits on the occasions and inclinations of the military to intervene
                     in politics, enhance the professionalism of the armed forces through doctrine
                     development, through transparency, accountability and civilians supreme over the                   ª£¸›²£ª±¡¡™²¥¸h¡¢h­¢—µÈ
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144