Page 66 - kpi21190
P. 66

66



                     20 years later, less than 30 percent is transferred to local administrative
               organization and not much more has happened. It seems decisions are taken in
               Bangkok, solutions are to be found in Bangkok. This has been repeated to me
               many times when I question local executives and ask them how do they solve
               problems at local level: they go to Bangkok. But many would also argue that both
               inequalities and democracy are best addressed at local level, thus calling for a more
               decentralized political and administrative system. Inequalities differ from one location
               to another. Determinants of inequality are geographically specific as they relate to
               the type of economic opportunities available in a specific location, to the geographic
               and topographic isolation of the area, to the climate and natural resources available
               in the area.


                     Solutions to address these inequalities and their root causes need to be
               informed by the local realities and best defined and implemented by authorities that
               are cognizant of these. Similarly, democracy as a system that values citizen
               participation and inclusion is more direct and, some argue, efficient if performed

               applying the principle of subsidiarity, meaning keeping the distance between
               decision and implementation of the decision shortest. Ensuring local governments
               are elected by citizens, are empowered to implement policies, raise revenues and
               allocate resources, all based on an understanding and acknowledgement of the

               socio-economic realities as well as the aspirations and interests of the local
               communities are not only elements of local democracy but also tools to addressing
               more efficiently inequalities. Decentralization reinforcing a democratic system
               therefore appears as a potentially powerful approach to addressing inequalities

               through empowerment.

                     Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, As mentioned earlier, all these
               considerations are not based on conclusive academic research, but based on
               observation and experience and there are as many counter examples as there are
         Keynote Speaker   and a strong understanding of local cultural and historical context are very
               success stories.

                     More than 20 years of development practice have taught me that pragmatism


               important when looking for development solutions to challenges that are increasingly

               complex, unpredictable and volatile.

                     Nevertheless, We can convinced that Agenda 2030 and the 17 SDGs offer an
               amazing and unique framework to addressing many of these challenges, including
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71