Page 64 - kpi20482

King Prajadhipok’s Institute 63

COMELEC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (2004, 2010,

AND 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS)

2004 2010 2016

Balanced Scorecard Dimensions
1. How clear and coherent have relevant Policy Enactments been?

Failure to implement COMELEC strategic COMELEC Strategic Plan
automation directions set for 2006- for 2011-2016 not trans-

• Last-minute hold 2010 but lack operational lated into operational
order issued by the details. measures and integrated
Supreme Court due • COMELEC issued En into the preparations for
to the questionable Banc Resolution No. the 2016 elections
bidding process 7669 or “Operation • Although the plan
for the counting MERIT (Modernization was adopted, the
machines. The and Electoral Reforms leadership of the
contract between with Integrity and Commission failed
COMELEC and Mega Transparency)” but to clearly articulate

Pacific was nullified. lacks a comprehensive in formal documents
Untimely issuance of plan of action for the how the achievement
COMELEC Resolutions accomplishment of of the set outcomes
• Inefficiency caused targeted AES goals and targets in the

by the issuance of and objectives. plan is contributive
resolutions on an • No alternative or and critical to the
ad hoc basis; a new contingency plan to
set of resolutions the AES was prepared successful imple-
issued for each or considered. mentation of the
election. AES,