Page 274 - kpi377
P. 274

success  on some unifocal  cultural or religious  traditiona have  tended to  fail  dismally.


                              The establishment of European military  hegemony over Asia  and Mrica has  been
                    well  discussed in  the  history of the modern world  what the history syllabus  of the  University
                    of Cambridge used to call when I was  a student there in the  1950s "the expansion of Europe"
                    (evoking the image of metal in heat). Along with military superiority, the economic dominance
                    of Europe was  amply  reinforced  by  Europe's  industrial  and  economic  power,  which  was  by

                    then also  firmly  established.  This  led  to  various  tributes  to  "Western values."


                              Even  within  Euripe.  industrial  success  came first  to  some economies  (like  Britain
                    and Germany) and not others. and on that basis  theorists.  most notably Max Weber (no less).
                    wrote in the hey day of that tradition that it was  protestant ethics that made such a success of
                    some  of the  European  economies.  However.  already  by  the  time  Max  Weber's  thesis  was
                    getting better known.  the  Catholic  countries  such  as  France and Italy  were  beginning  to  do
                    very  well  (quite  a  bit  better  than  Britain.  which  kept  slipping  in  the  European  league  of
                    economic  development).  So  the  thesis  was  promptly  changed  from  the  advantages  of

                    protestantism  to  that of Christianity and Western values  in  general.


                              Then,  however. Japan broke through with  an  unprecedented record  of economic
                    expansion. As  a result. the Eurocentric view had to adapt itself further to include Japan in  the
                    world of provileged cultures. Spectific Japanese norms. traditions and values from  the martial
                    Samurai  heritage  to  its  family  centred  business  traditions  began  getting  very  special  and
                    favourable  attention.  In  the first  half of the  twentieth century,  the contrast took  the form  of

                    asking  why Japan  was  "the  only  non  Western  country  to  have  become  a  major  industrial
                    nation?,,7  And  more  specifically:  "Why  did  modern  industrial  capitalism  arise  in  one  East
                    Asian  society (Japan)  and not in  another (China)?"s


                              But then things moved further. Some Asian countries and regions other than Japan
                    such  as  South Korea. Singapore. Taiwan. Hong Kong started doing very well.  and the identi-
                    fication of Asian successes had to be extended to them too. So the Samurai had to give way to
                    shared  traditions  on  the  eastern  edge  of Asia.  This  development  has  more  recently  been

                    followed by  mainland China itself becoming a country with very fast economic growth, with a
                    rapid transformation of its economy towards modern industrialism. So the theses  now shifted
                    to  special virtues  of Confucianism a cultural tie  that was  seen as  binding together China and
                   Japan  and  much  of East  Asia.  A lot  of the  reading  of Asian  values  has  taken  the  form  of
                    identitying them with  the  teachings  of Confucius.



                             7F.v.  Moulder. Jiman.  China.  and  the  Modem  World  Economy  : Toward  a  Reintemretation  of East  Asian
                    Develop-ment  (c.  1600  to  c. 1918)  (Cambridge : Cambridge University  Press. 1977).  page vii.
                             'N. Jacobs. The Origin  of Modern  Capitalism and Eastern  Asia  (Hong Kong. 1958).  page ix.
   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279