Page 214 - kpi377
P. 214

the  chairmanship  of Prawet  Wasi,  the  DDC  was  tasked  with  presenting  a  framework  for
                  political reform. Their report was sent to Parliament less than one year later, on 28 April 1995.
                  The report proposed the  transfer  of responsibility for  organizing elections  from  the perma-
                  nent  bureaucracy  to  an  independent  and  politically  neutral  commission  with  the  aim  of
                  conducting elections  that are more just and clean.


                            Shortly  after  the  report  had  been  submitted,  a  new  government  with  Banharn

                  Silapaarcha  as  the  Prime  Minister  assumed  office.  In  his  policy  statement  to  Parliament,
                  delivered on 26 July 1995, Banharn promised to pursue political reform and amend article 211
                  of the constitution accordingly to enable the establishment of a Constitution Drafting Assem-
                  bly, as  had been suggested by the DDC. But,  first,  a new  committee was  called into being-the
                  Political  Reform Committee  (rll;ll~nd"jJ.m1,.tJ~~tJnT'Hitf)\1) (PRC).  It was  headed by  Banharn's
                  brother, Chumpol, and had the task of reviewing the reform framework Prawet had produced
                  (some saw its  major task as being foot-dragging).  This exercise lasted for more than one year,
                  until. in November 1996, the so-called Political Development Plan was presented.  The authors
                  of the  plan  were  somewhat  more  hesitant  to  immediately  entrust  a  new  organization  with

                  conducting  elections.  Nevertheless,  the  Political  Reform  Committee's  short-term  proposal
                  confirmed  that  an  election  commission  should  be  established.  But  its  role  was  limited  to
                  supervision.  However,  in  their  long-term  plan; -spanning  a  period  of five  years,  the  PRC
                  envisaged an expansion of the commission's task to include control. and later administering of
                  elections.  It was  also  suggested  that the  commission should  organize  elections  at  every  level
                  and be truly autonomous.



                            As it turned out. members of the Constitution Drafting Assembly (CDA) preferred
                  an  immediate  clear  break with  the  past.  Accordingly,  part 4  (sections  136-148)  of the  1997
                  Constitution  stipulates  the  details  of a  new  organization  called  the  'Election  Commission'
                  (ECT).  It consists of, "a Chairman and other four Commissioners appointed by  the King with
                  the advice of the Senate, from persons of apparent political impartiality and integity" (section
                  136 1).2 The ECT must have an independent administration, and the government is  mandated
                  to  provide an  'adequate' budget both for  day-to-day operations  and for  the conduct of elec-
                  tions.  The first  group  of commissioners  (who  normally  serve  a  single  seven-year  term)  was

                  appointed on 27  November 1997. Each commissioner is  responsible for one of the five  ECT-
                  sections  or offices  (see  the organization charts  in  the appendix),  namely  general  administra-
                  tion, investigation and adjudicafion, election administration, public participation, and political
                  party affairs and referendum (the ECT is  also  the political party registrar, and it is  responsible
                  for  conducting referenda).



                            The commissioners' backgrounds are very different. and so are the perceptions and


                            2  Quoted according to  the  official  translation prepared by  the  Council  of State.
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219