Page 224 - kpi20482
P. 224

King Prajadhipok’s Institute  223





                        5. The automation of elections in the Philippines, despite
               the numerous organizational and technical issues it raised, had an

               overall positive effect on public trust in the voting process, and
               public confidence in the COMELEC. The adoption of an AES also
               triggered institutional changes and improvements in the IEC. The

               Philippine case shows that investment in election automation pays off,
               with the AES introducing a more efficient voting system and heightened

               process security/ safeguards, and triggering institutional changes and
               arrangements that correspond to the requirements and demands of the
               new system. It is important, however, as gleaned from the COMELEC’s

               implementation experience, that the IEC:

                        a)   Engage in administrative and organizational review and

                            restructuring (e.g. integrate system administrators and
                            project management teams in staff) and institutional change

                            management programs before AES implementation.

                        b)   Make ample time (at least 2 years) for the necessary

                            comprehensive planning, operational programming, internal
                            technical skills development, and public promotion.

                        c)   Ensure transparency by engaging NGO and CSO partners

                            in the monitoring of all stages of the implementation
                            process (i.e. procurement, budget planning and spending,

                            AES design and configuration of security features, technical
                            and logistical preparations, polling place management,

                            parallel counting, legal monitoring, and aid).

                        d)   Put in place project and system monitoring and evaluation

                            (M&E) to facilitate interim and post-election assessments.
   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229