Page 50 - kpi17073
P. 50

การประชุมวิชาการ
                                                                                         สถาบันพระปกเกล้า ครั้งที่ 16   49


                      center and the localities and the people. Indonesia, under President Habibie, issued a
                      law in the year 1999, devolved the power from Jakarta down to the seventeen

                      thousand islands of Indonesia. And scholars have told us that because of that law,
                      under President Habibie, who took over from President Suharto, who was forced out
                      of office because of the financial crisis in 1997-1998.  We were told that that law

                      saved Indonesia as a country. That law prevented Indonesia from becoming a
                      Yugoslavia of Asia. - “แปลว่าแตกกระสานซ่านเซ็น”  That law prevented Indonesia from

                      being a Balkan of Southeast Asia. Devolved the power from the center out to the
                      people, out to the country, out to the peripheries, so that we can save the country.
                      The Philippines has done the same thing, even during the time of President Marcos.

                      He was forced in his interim constitution to pay lip service to decentralization, to give
                      room, to give space for the provinces to join the central government in the

                      development of the country instead. And Malaysia has a very complex system of
                      federalism because they have their Sultans, because they have their states, because
                      they have their state law, because they have their many layers of federalism in

                      Malaysia, but it is decentralized. My point is we will have to think about this issue
                      and I am glad it is one of this conference’s issues. This is a very, very crucial and

                      critical issue for Thailand today: decentralization. When governors are appointed from
                      Bangkok, when police chiefs appointed from Bangkok, district officers appointed from
                      Bangkok, judges appointed from Bangkok. Every position in the province appointed

                      from Bangkok. Military commanders appointed from Bangkok. You know what
                      happens? Those appointed officials will walk to the people, to the countryside, to the

                      regions with their back to the people and facing Bangkok. Why? Because Bangkok
                      appointed them. They will get promotion not from the people but from the boss in
                      Bangkok. And when you relocate officials from one province to the next, people have

                      no way of knowing what’s the record, what has he done. Has he been good all his
                      career?  Or he has committed certain mistakes, corruption, but he has been relocated

                      to us as a punishment? People have no way to know. It has to be made transparent.
                      And better yet, let them have their own officials through their own local provincial
                      elections.  We will have to think about that. Time has passed since Thailand could be

                      governed by this suffocating centralized bureaucracy. If we do not address this
                      problem, we are not going to get through this critical period of competition coming

                      our way in every direction. Thailand will have to measure up to the demand and the
                      pressure of competition [that will happen after we become ASEAN Community and
                      have to open up the country to deal with globalization because we are not going to

                      survive by building walls to protect ourselves. So, we have to think about the
                      centralization (spoken in Thai)]. So we have to think about decentralization. So we
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55