Page 22 - 21211_fulltext
P. 22

การประหยัดจากขนาดในองค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่น
                                                                         และวิเคราะห์ศักยภาพการควบรวมท้องถิ่นขนาดเล็ก




                           Fourth, from our survey of small-sized local units (those in
                     rankpop<501), from which we obtain 159 returned questionnaire. Data
                     analysis leads to a conclusion that: i) most local units have known about
                     the intention of government to support local amalgamation along the
                     proposal of the NRSA, ii) about one-thirds of local units have discussed
                     over the proposal for amalgamation; iii) the local administrators
                     perceived that so far the government had not strongly pushed for local
                     merge, as the government has been silenced about the process in detail
                     nor the condition for local merge specified; iv) about two-thirds of local
                     administrators and government officers agree with the idea that “One
                     tambon, one local administration”; v) some administrators agree with the
                     idea for local merge as this could lessen inequality at least to a certain
                     extent and some provide supporting evidence that the local public
                     services in rural area were inadequate and clearly less than the nearby
                     urban located units—yet this statement if far from being definitive or
                     conclusive.
                           Fifth, from past experiences we found 2 case studies of successful
                     and voluntarily amalgamation: the first case refers to the Wang Nam Yen
                     Municipality, and we learned from a site-visit and discussion that the
                     merge was successful, people were satisfied, the municipality’s activities
                     expanded and, over the past years, the municipality received the “good
                     governance award” from government several times.

                           Sixth, part of our analysis focusses on “risk of being forced to
                     merge” which comprise of 4 components (or variables) which somehow
                     indicate inefficient use of resource:  the first component refers to R1:
                     poor or “below par” in the score of LPA; the second component refers
                     to R2: too high dependence on grant or subsidy from government
                     budget; the third component is expressed in R3: high per capita staff
                     expenditure, and the fourth component R4: the ratio of local staffs to
                     1000population is very high or significantly above the mean level.

                           Seventh, there is a possibility for voluntary amalgamation and yet
                     it may be reasonable to provide a special grant in transition for





                                                                          สถาบันพระปกเกล้า   XXI
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27